Custom Search


Friday, November 19, 2010


not really but i am beginning to believe they should be expelled.

"in state (resident)" Tuition???? Financial aid????

A federal law passed in 1996 said states could not provide "a postsecondary education benefit to an alien not lawfully present unless any citizen or national is eligible for such benefit." Somehow the Obama justice has the time to file suit against Arizona for in effect enforcing federal law. but they have not the time to see that Federal laws regarding immigration are enforced?

NEWSFLASH: Next will be "Small Business" incentives and Help for Drug Cartel leaders. (sic)


Monday, November 15, 2010

Tax cuts

Jobs and tax hikes:
i'm sorry but extending tax hikes (for the middle class or the rich) are useless for everyone as they only affect working people. A large amount of people are unemployed and will not be helped either way. i believe a better solution would be extending the tax rates as they are AND a direct tax credit to any employer (large or small) who hires a NEW employee and keeps them employed for one calender year.
This will:

1. increase employment; (obviously as an incentive to hire)

2. more people will pay taxes ie: fica, income, and all the rest

3. increase US production;

4. reduce unemployment benefits payed out;

5. stimulate the economy with more people working and buying goods and services;

7. and the best part is the tax credits will pay for themselves by any new employee kept on the payroll for at least one year will (should) pay more into the system than the tax credits cost.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

The big picture.....

It appears we are on the cusp of a change in government. At least that seems to be the consensus at Fox news. Now before the 2 or 3 Liberals whom sometime read my stuff start screaming it appears that the liberal media also seem to acknowledge this though they are doing their best to downplay it.
Now it seems a "done deal" that the Republicans will take a majority in the house. The Senate...maybe not. What will happen next will be .....nothing or very little at best. the one hing to be sure is that Nancy pelosi will berelegated to the trashpile of history. Speaking of which I happen to remember an interview with Nancy in 2006 when Democrats were attempting to take Congress from the Republicans where she was quoted as saying "Our system of Government has been built on a system of checks nd balances. The most dangerous thing imaginable would be one party in charge of all branches of government". Seems she conveniently forgot that in 2007. Anyway what will happen now will be Republican proposals and the Swoosh of Obama's veto pen. Sure Obama will be making conciliatory noises about bipartisanship and cooperation but in reality he is far too arrogant and agenda driven to make this course of action believable. Now for the next two years the two parties will spend their time bickering and not really accomplishing anything. This election is really about 2012 where each will blame the other for the continuing decline of this country.

* At this second I'm listening to the talking head on MSNBC throw Rahm Emmanuel on the funeral pyre as in to blame for the obama administration's failures.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Where's the outrage E.J. Montini?

I live in Scottsdale, Arizona. One week ago today there was a hate crime committed here. Late Monday night/Tuesday morning my friend went to the Circle K on 68th and Avalon for a soda. He rode up on his bicycle and heard a commotion from down the street and saw approximately 50 people involved in a fight in the middle of 68th street. On a closer look he realized that there were about 25 people administering a beating to one man while the rest of the crowd encouraged them. My friend ran in the store and told the clerk to call 911. At about that time the man broke away from the crowd and ran to the store. The crowd caught him in the parking lot and continued the beating. Eventually the police showed up and arrested 20 "suspects". The victim went to the hospital. The next day there was literally no mention of this incident in either the newspapers (your own included Mr Montini) or the TV news. E.J. you shout about the victims of injustices as you perceive them...Where Sir is your outrage? The marches? The protests? Inconvenient perhaps?
Did I forget to mention that the victim was white? Or that all the suspects were Hispanic?
I suggest you consider what your actions would be if the situation had been reversed. I submit that your outrage would know no limits.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Once Again...selective memory

Early this morning I'm watching MSNBC (yes Ricky,unlike you I DO watch opposing viewpoints), and the blonde talking head anchorwoman is interviewing Chris Matthews (an msnbc commentator generously referred to as radical liberal) and they are discussing the now common concept of a Republican slaughter of House Democrats on Tuesday. Chris was heard to say "The economy is in shambles...when (not if) the GOP take control of the House they will control the Nations purse strings"......HEY CHRIS....Your beloved Democrats have blamed GWB and the GOP for causing the "Economic Crisis". In the end of 2006 the deficit was 200 Billion. Ok not a small number but, in the short four years since the Dems took Congress (House and Senate) the deficit has grown to several TRILLION dollars. In 2007 the national unemployment rate was 7%....."If We do not pass this Stimulus Package unemployment may climb to 8%". Latest report indicates 9.7%.
Selective Memory at it's finest.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Democratic Dictionary

bipartisan :"Do it our way".

compromise: "do it our way"

debate: Deny, deflect, ignore "do it our way"

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Why are you staring at me you PIG?,1943

bullshit...when we stop looking she'll find something else to remain the center of attention.

Alright then..i suppose then it's ok/

"Mexican lake victim possibly mistaken for other"

Shame on him for looking like a Mexican drug dealer.

obama will not come to the border states to see whaat we deal with.....

yet another example liberal of spin control.


Current definition:

Do it the way the Democrats want.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

"When did you stop beating your wife?" A sure sign of Democratic desperation

Seems they're just making this shit up:

"My column tomorrow is about President Obama's recent attacks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for 1) collecting money from foreign affiliates (totaling about 0.05 percent of its budget) and 2) sponsoring ads that criticize Democrats. White House Counsel Bob Bauer insists the president did not mean to suggest any connection between those two points, even though he repeatedly put them in the same sentence, since that would amount to accusing the group of violating the federal ban on election-related spending by foreign nationals. "Obama admits he has no evidence to support that charge." (quotation marks mine) "But neither does he have any evidence to refute it!" (damned if you do, damned if you don't!) Which, according to presidential adviser David Axelrod, is the whole point—i.e., the president feels no compunction about making shit up without full disclosure, who can say whether the Chamber of Commerce is violating the law?" (Who can say HE never did?)

"Well i don't have any proof you DO beat your wife....but then i don't have any proof you DON'T" Likewise no proof I did not kidnap the Lindbergh baby either. SHEESH!

From that vast conservative(?) think tank at the New York Times:

"[A] closer examination shows that there is little evidence that what the chamber does in collecting overseas dues is improper or even unusual, according to both liberal and conservative election-law lawyers and campaign finance documents.
In fact, the controversy over the Chamber of Commerce financing may say more about the Washington spin cycle — where an Internet blog posting can be quickly picked up by like-minded groups and become political fodder for the president himself — than it does about the vagaries of campaign finance."

And we all know how The New York Times stands up for Conservative values(sic).