Custom Search

I CAN'T BELIEVE HE SAID THAT OUT LOUD

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Once Again...selective memory

Early this morning I'm watching MSNBC (yes Ricky,unlike you I DO watch opposing viewpoints), and the blonde talking head anchorwoman is interviewing Chris Matthews (an msnbc commentator generously referred to as radical liberal) and they are discussing the now common concept of a Republican slaughter of House Democrats on Tuesday. Chris was heard to say "The economy is in shambles...when (not if) the GOP take control of the House they will control the Nations purse strings"......HEY CHRIS....Your beloved Democrats have blamed GWB and the GOP for causing the "Economic Crisis". In the end of 2006 the deficit was 200 Billion. Ok not a small number but, in the short four years since the Dems took Congress (House and Senate) the deficit has grown to several TRILLION dollars. In 2007 the national unemployment rate was 7%....."If We do not pass this Stimulus Package unemployment may climb to 8%". Latest report indicates 9.7%.
Selective Memory at it's finest.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Democratic Dictionary

bipartisan :"Do it our way".

compromise: "do it our way"

debate: Deny, deflect, ignore "do it our way"

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Why are you staring at me you PIG?

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Ines-Sainz-is-returning-to-work-but-not-to-NFL-?urn=nfl-277054


http://www.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1024&bih=632&tbs=isch:1&q=ines+sainz+thong&revid=1883619589&sa=X&ei=DLC3TKvbLYaBlAeklrCKCQ&ved=0CCMQ1QIoAA#0,1943


bullshit...when we stop looking she'll find something else to remain the center of attention.

Alright then..i suppose then it's ok/

"Mexican lake victim possibly mistaken for other"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101014/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_border_lake_shooting

Shame on him for looking like a Mexican drug dealer.

obama will not come to the border states to see whaat we deal with.....

yet another example liberal of spin control.

Biprtisanship:

Current definition:

Do it the way the Democrats want.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

"When did you stop beating your wife?" A sure sign of Democratic desperation

Seems they're just making this shit up:


http://reason.com/blog/2010/10/12/the-president-is-just-asking-q

"My column tomorrow is about President Obama's recent attacks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for 1) collecting money from foreign affiliates (totaling about 0.05 percent of its budget) and 2) sponsoring ads that criticize Democrats. White House Counsel Bob Bauer insists the president did not mean to suggest any connection between those two points, even though he repeatedly put them in the same sentence, since that would amount to accusing the group of violating the federal ban on election-related spending by foreign nationals. "Obama admits he has no evidence to support that charge." (quotation marks mine) "But neither does he have any evidence to refute it!" (damned if you do, damned if you don't!) Which, according to presidential adviser David Axelrod, is the whole point—i.e., the president feels no compunction about making shit up without full disclosure, who can say whether the Chamber of Commerce is violating the law?" (Who can say HE never did?)

"Well i don't have any proof you DO beat your wife....but then i don't have any proof you DON'T" Likewise no proof I did not kidnap the Lindbergh baby either. SHEESH!

From that vast conservative(?) think tank at the New York Times:
http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/7135-obamas-false-attack-on-the-chamber-of-commerce-

"[A] closer examination shows that there is little evidence that what the chamber does in collecting overseas dues is improper or even unusual, according to both liberal and conservative election-law lawyers and campaign finance documents.
In fact, the controversy over the Chamber of Commerce financing may say more about the Washington spin cycle — where an Internet blog posting can be quickly picked up by like-minded groups and become political fodder for the president himself — than it does about the vagaries of campaign finance."

And we all know how The New York Times stands up for Conservative values(sic).